Recognizing our Reviewers and Authors, and a Few Insights into Tektonika’s Review Process
Main Article Content
Abstract
To mark the publication of this first issue of Tektonika’s second volume, we were inspired to write a short editorial focusing on our reviewers and our review process, providing thoughts and tips on what makes a great review and author rebuttal.
Article Details
References
Annesley, T. M. (2011), Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and editor comments, Clinical chemistry, 57(4), 551–554, doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.162388.
Dahlgren, P. M. (2022), Instructions for Reviewer 2: How to reject a manuscript for arbitrary reasons, OSF Preprints, doi: 10.31219/osf.io/t8jsm.
Gastel, B., and R. A. Day (2016), How to write and publish a scientific paper, 8th edition, 8 ed., Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa Barbara, California.
Habibie, P., and K. Hyland (Eds.) (2018), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers, 1 ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5.
Wager, E., F. Godlee, and T. Jefferson (2002), How to survive peer review, How To, 5. impr ed., BMJ Books, London, England.