Recognizing our Reviewers and Authors, and a Few Insights into Tektonika’s Review Process

Article Sidebar

3D numerical model of a subduction zone, showing viscosity (background, Viridis colourmap), velocity field (black arrows), and two particles tracking deformation above (pink line) and behind (blue line) the slab. The modelling work aims to assess the importance of anisotropic viscosity of mantle olivine texture during subduction. See Wang et al. (2024) in this issue for more details.
Editorial (PDF)
Published: Aug 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55575/tektonika2024.2.1.87
Keywords:
Editorial DOAJ peer review

Main Article Content

Robin Lacassin
Tektonika Executive Editor Team; Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1424-325X
Clare Bond
Tektonika Core Team; School of Geosciences, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, UK
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-2901
Tony Doré
Tektonika Executive Editor Team; Energy & Geoscience Institute, London, UK
Mohamed Gouiza
Tektonika Core Team; School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-2698
Janine Kavanagh
Tektonika Executive Editor Team; School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-9843
Gwenn Peron-Pindivic
Tektonika Executive Editor Team; Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-5754
Lucía Pérez-Díaz
Tektonika Core Team; Halliburton, UK
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6922-3275
J. Kim Welford
Tektonika Executive Editor Team; Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-5303
Graeme Eagles
Tektonika Executive Editor Team; Alfred Wegener Institute, Am Alten Hafen 26, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-0810
Renata Schmitt
Tektonika Executive Editor Team; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6349-5459
David Fernández-Blanco
Tektonika Core Team
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5326-9164
Dave McCarthy
Tektonika Core Team; British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

To mark the publication of this first issue of Tektonika’s second volume, we were inspired to write a short editorial focusing on our reviewers and our review process, providing thoughts and tips on what makes a great review and author rebuttal.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lacassin, R., Bond, C., Doré, T., Gouiza, M., Kavanagh, J., Peron-Pindivic, G., Pérez-Díaz, L., Welford, J. K. ., Eagles, G. ., Schmitt, R. ., Fernández-Blanco, D. ., & McCarthy, D. (2024). Recognizing our Reviewers and Authors, and a Few Insights into Tektonika’s Review Process. τeκτoniκa, 2(1), I-III. https://doi.org/10.55575/tektonika2024.2.1.87
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Annesley, T. M. (2011), Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and editor comments, Clinical chemistry, 57(4), 551–554, doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.162388.

Dahlgren, P. M. (2022), Instructions for Reviewer 2: How to reject a manuscript for arbitrary reasons, OSF Preprints, doi: 10.31219/osf.io/t8jsm.

Gastel, B., and R. A. Day (2016), How to write and publish a scientific paper, 8th edition, 8 ed., Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa Barbara, California.

Habibie, P., and K. Hyland (Eds.) (2018), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers, 1 ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5.

Wager, E., F. Godlee, and T. Jefferson (2002), How to survive peer review, How To, 5. impr ed., BMJ Books, London, England.