Tektonika: The Community-Led Diamond Open-Access Journal for Tectonics and Structural Geology

Main Article Content

David Fernández-Blanco
Robin Lacassin
Mohamed Gouiza
Lucia Perez-Diaz
Craig Magee
Dave McCarthy
Tony Doré
Gwenn Péron-Pinvidic
Janine Kavanagh
Clare Bond
Renata Schmitt

Abstract

Knowledge (b)locking impedes scientific breakthroughs and hinders societal development. Historically, the privileged and paid access to scholarly work has held captive the advancement of numerous brilliant minds and their ideas. The Tektonika initiative was born to remedy the unfairness of the current publishing scene by offering the community a platform where tectonics and structural geology research are freely and openly accessible to everyone. As part of a growing movement within academia, Tektonika provides an alternative to conventional publishing models that restrict access to scholarly work through costly paywalls and subscriptions. In this editorial, we explain why and how Tektonika exists, the structure of the journal, and how it is run a year after its launch. We also detail our peer-review process from manuscript submission to publication, and report on some of the challenges faced. We close by presenting our plan and ideas to sustain a community-led inclusive and equitable publishing landscape that secures a free-to-all access to Earth Science research over the long term.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fernández-Blanco, D., Lacassin, R., Gouiza, M., Perez-Diaz, L., Magee, C., McCarthy, D., Doré, T., Péron-Pinvidic, G., Kavanagh, J., Bond, C., & Schmitt, R. (2023). Tektonika: The Community-Led Diamond Open-Access Journal for Tectonics and Structural Geology. τeκτoniκa, 1(1), I-XIII. https://doi.org/10.55575/tektonika2023.1.1.56
Section
Articles

References

Ancion, Z., L. Borrell-Damián, P. Mounier, J. Rooryck, and B. Saenen (2022), Action plan for diamond open access, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6282403.

Baldwin, M. (2017), In referees we trust?, Physics today, 70(2), 44–49, doi: 10.1063/pt.3.3463.

Bernard, R. E., and E. H. G. Cooperdock (2018), No progress on diversity in 40 years, Nature geoscience, 11(5), 292–295, doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6.

Dowey, N., J. Barclay, B. Fernando, S. Giles, J. Houghton, C. Jackson, A. Khatwa, A. Lawrence, K. Mills, A. Newton, S. Rogers, and R. Williams (2021), A UK perspective on tackling the geoscience racial diversity crisis in the global north, Nature geoscience, 14(5), 256–259, doi: 10.1038/s41561-021-00737-w.

Farquharson, J. I., and F. B. Wadsworth (2018), Introducing volcanica: The first diamond open-access journal for volcanology, Volcanica, 1(1), i–ix, doi: 10.30909/vol.01.01.i-ix.

Fernández-Blanco, D., M. Gouiza, C. Bond, D. McCarthy, A. Lee, and L. Pérez-Díaz (2022), Tektonika, the new diamond open access journal for structural geology and tectonics, Tech. Rep. EGU22-12042, Copernicus Meetings, doi: 10.5194/egusphere- egu22-12042.

Gouiza, M., D. F. Blanco, C. Bond, D. McCarthy, A. Lee, L. Pérez-Díaz, and τ eκτ oniκa community (2021a), τeκτoniκa, a journal for an open future, in EGU General Assembly 2021, EGU21-11146, pp. EGU21–11,146, Copernicus Meetings, doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11146.

Gouiza, M., C. Bond, D. Fernandez-Blanco, D. McCarthy, L. Perez Diaz, and A. Lee (2021b), Tektonika, unlocking earth sciences, pp. U43E–08, ui.adsabs.harvard.edu.

Grossmann, A., and B. Brembs (2021), Current market rates for scholarly publishing services, F1000Research, 10, 20, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.27468.2.

Hagve, M. (2020), The money behind academic publishing, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 140(11), doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0118.

Handley, H. K., J. Hillman, M. Finch, T. Ubide, S. Kachovich, S. McLaren, A. Petts, J. Purandare, A. Foote, and C. Tiddy (2020), In australasia, gender is still on the agenda in geosciences, Advances in Geosciences, 53, 205–226, doi: 10.5194/adgeo-53- 205-2020.

Hori, R. S. (2020), Progress and problems of gender equality in japanese academics and geosciences, Advances in Geosciences, 53, 195–203, doi: 10.5194/adgeo-53-195-2020.

Kamm, R., C. K. Schelten, and G. Braker (2020), Gender equality in marine sciences in kiel, germany: how project-funded measures can urge institutions to act, Advances in Geosciences, 53, 97–106, doi: 10.5194/adgeo-53-97-2020.

Kavanagh, J. L., C. J. Annen, S. Burchardt, C. Chalk, E. Gallant, J. Morin, J. Scarlett, and R. Williams (2022), Volcanologists—who are we and where are we going?, Bulletin of Volcanology, 84(5), 53, doi: 10.1007/s00445-022-01547-7.

Lee, C. J., C. R. Sugimoto, G. Zhang, and B. Cronin (2013), Bias in peer review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2–17, doi: 10.1002/asi.22784.

Morrison, H. (2018), Global OA APCs (APC) 2010–2017: major trends, Journal d’Interaction Personne-Système.

Narock, T., E. B. Goldstein, C. A.-L. Jackson, A. A. Bubeck, A. M. L. Enright, J. I. Farquharson, A. Fernández, D. Fernández-Blanco, S. Girardclos, D. E. Ibarra, S. K. Lengger, A. Mackay, V. Venema, B. Whitehead, and J.-P. Ampuero (2019), Earth science is ready for preprints, Eos, p. 6, doi: 10.1029/2019EO121347.

Pourret, O., D. W. Hedding, D. E. Ibarra, D. E. Irawan, H. Liu, and J. P. Tennant (2021), International disparities in open access practices in the earth sciences, Esencia Odontologica, 47, e63,663, doi: 10.3897/ese.2021.e63663.

Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017), What is open peer review? a systematic review, F1000Research, 6, 588, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2.

Rowe, C., M. Agius, J. Convers, G. Funning, C. Galasso, S. Hicks, T. Huynh, J. Lange, T. Lecocq, H. Mark, T. Ragon, C. Rychert, S. Teplitzky, M. Van den Ende, and R. Okuwaki (2022), The launch of seismica: a seismic shift in publishing, Seismica, 1(1), doi: 10.26443/seismica.v1i1.255.

Schmidt, B., T. Ross-Hellauer, X. van Edig, and E. C. Moylan (2018), Ten considerations for open peer review, F1000Research, 7, 969, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15334.1.

Smith, R. (2006), Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178–182, doi: 10.1177/014107680609900414.

Suber, P. (2012), Open Access, MIT Press.

Tennant, J. P., J. M. Dugan, D. Graziotin, D. C. Jacques, F. Waldner, D. Mietchen, Y. Elkhatib, L. B Collister, C. K. Pikas, T. Crick, P. Masuzzo, A. Caravaggi, D. R. Berg, K. E. Niemeyer, T. Ross-Hellauer, S. Mannheimer, L. Rigling, D. S. Katz, B. Greshake Tzovaras, J. Pacheco-Mendoza, N. Fatima, M. Poblet, M. Isaakidis, D. E. Irawan, S. Renaut, C. R. Madan, L. Matthias, J. Nørgaard Kjær, D. P. O’Donnell, C. Neylon, S. Kearns, M. Selvaraju, and J. Colomb (2017), A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, F1000Research, 6, 1151, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12037.3.

Van Noorden, R. (2013), Open access: The true cost of science publishing, Nature, 495(7442), 426–429, doi: 10.1038/495426a.

van Rooyen, S., F. Godlee, S. Evans, N. Black, and R. Smith (1999), Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: a randomised trial, BMJ, 318(7175), 23–27, doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23.

Willinsky, J. (2005), Open journal systems: An example of open source software for journal management and publishing, Library Hi Tech, 23(4), 504–519, doi: 10.1108/07378830510636300.